Oh well. @Shrikanth_krish (going by the name ‘Srikanta Krishnamacarya’) tweeted a series of three tweets, comparing the two leaders. (h/t Sridhar Tiruchendurai at justexperience.blogspot.com)

And, there are problems with that. Read the rest of this entry »

ஹைய்யா! என்னுடைய புளகாங்கிதத்துக்கு அளவேயில்லை. :-)) Read the rest of this entry »

ஹ்ஹ! இந்தப் பரிந்துரை வருமென்று எதிர்பார்த்து, சிரமேற்கொண்டு… Read the rest of this entry »

மே 20. இன்று: பாகிஸ்தானிய ராணுவம் + பங்க்ளாதேஷ் இஸ்லாமிய வெறி ரஸாக்கர்கள் சேர்ந்து சுமார் 8000-10000 ஹிந்துக்களை (= நிராயுதபாணிக் குழந்தைகள், பெண்கள், ஆண்கள்… அனைவரும் இஸ்லாமிய அடக்குமுறைகளுக்குத் தப்பி பாரதம் செல்ல முயன்று கொண்டிருந்த அப்பாவி ஏழை அகதிகள்) கொத்தாகக் கொன்ற தினத்தின் 49ஆம் ஆண்டுவிழா. Read the rest of this entry »

Okay, I retrieved another experiment/details teacher-doc from elsewhere and my broken hard-disk – I wrote a draft of this some 12-13 years back or so. (Here’s one on micrometeorites!) Read the rest of this entry »

பிஸ்மில்லாஹ் இர்-ரஹ்மான் இர்-ரஹீம்

அறிக்கை

லா இல்லாஹா இல்-அல்லாஹ் முஹம்மது-ர்-ரஸூலல்லாஹ்!

சீனாக்கார கொரோனா கோவிட்-19 வைரஸ் ஜிஹாத் தொடர்பான… Read the rest of this entry »

Yes. Akbar ‘the Great’ s/o Humayun, grand son of Babur, was actually a Jihadi. He worked for his Caliphate. He hated Infidels/kaafirs. He was for an Islamic State & was an Islamist.  He was for annihilation of Kaafirs/infidels. He killed non-combatant Hindus. Enslaved hapless Hindu women & Children. Looted. Was for the destruction of ‘polytheist’ Hindu idols & temples. One of the stellar examples of this set of attributes of Akbar, is what happened during and after his ‘Siege of Chittorgarh’ circa 1568.

That is, Akbar followed Islamic practices as exemplified by his Prophet.

If Akbar were around now, he would be heading ISIS, yes – and of course, would be beheading Kaafirs/Kuf’rs. Thanks so much!

Jodha Jihadi Akbar

That’s why he is the darling of our Left-liberal, eminent Twistorians.

-0-0-0-0-0-

Some notes based on his own admissions & fathnama ‘victorious rants’ follow. This was originally posted by me, as a twitter thread comprising some 15 tweets, and is reproduced here.

Debunking the myths about Jalaluddin ‘Akbar,’ the blood thirsty Mongol/Mughal warlord… …that, he was a humanist, considerate etc – with all the fabricated/overdone stories of ‘sulh-i kul‘ universal peace, ‘deen-i illahi,’ religious tolerance, ganga-jamuni tehzeeb… (1/15)

Because he was an out-and-out Islamist Jihadi mass-murderer, who was most interested in playing his designated role as the lead of his Islamist Caliphate. (and to think that Akbar is celebrated for his ‘sarva dharma sambhavana’ etc!) (2/15)

Siege of Chittorgarh (Mewar, Rajasthan) happened between October 1567 & February 1568; the Sisodias & their vastly outnumbered brave Rajput warriors of Mewar defended their fort for ~4 months against the continuous assaults of a much superiorly armed Mongol army of Akbar. (3/15)

Finally Siege was broken and the Mongols won.

Then, Mughals followed up their bloodbath with the killing of innocents – boys, men + slave taking of women, as authorized in Islam. Qatl-e-aam. ‘massacring in-general/all.’ With the full blessings & based on an ORDER of Akbar. (4/15)

Extracts from the Fathnama-e-Chitor (9th March, 1958) – a ‘victory letter’ issued by Akbar from Ajmer, in which he clearly says he is waging a Jihad, invokes Islam, calls his state a Caliphate & orders mass killings of the innocent Hindus in the name of Allah & his Prophet. (5/15)

Akbar considers himself a Sultan working on the idea of khilafat/caliphate and says Allah helped his army finish off the Infidels. And, quotes extensively from Quran. Many bloodthirsty ‘sword verses’ are quoted. (6/15)

In which, he considers his state a khilafat / Caliphate. So much for the myth & the systematic propaganda that Moghuls ‘blended in’ with Indians and Bharat – whereas in reality, the Mongol horde/invaders where ONLY in interested in converting Bharat to Dar al-Islam. (7/15)

Akbar is very clear; he talks about War (Ghiza) AND, Jihad.

Under Jihad, as he says, he has annihilated infidels, raised the standard of Islam, removed the darkness of polytheism by Sword. Destroyed temples, idols in India!

(but Akbar is SECULAR!) (8/15)

Akbar makes it clear that War (Ghiza) as well as Jihad, were in his mind when he was planning to attack the Rana (=Udai Singh II, father of Maharana Pratap Singh) of Chitor.

Akbar also thought of his increasing zeal for his ‘divine religion!’ Is Jihad Secular or what?? (9/15)

Akbar makes it amply clear that his soldiers/troops were merely Jihadis, who were interested in achieving ‘martyrdom.’ (10/15)

After the siege is broken, the Islamist army of Akbar, as per command, does Qatl-e-aam.

Killing of ALL infidels. Outright massacre of even non-combatants. Enormous slave taking of women+children.

Because ‘Allah permits it.’ He was an austere scholar of Islam, of course! (11/15)

More than 30, 000 Hindus got massacred in this particular instance of Qatl-e-aam.

While winding up / summarizing his Fathnama, Akbar is happy that a Jihad was waged successfully and is therefore thankful to Allah, in a secular-liberal way, of course! (12/15)

Akbar winds up his Jihadi Fathnama with the hope that he will reach the seat of his Caliphate – Agra soon. (13/15)

Our left-liberals are oh so particular about reiterating that Mughals, especially like Akbar, were very Indianized and were more Indians than Hindus.

So, a Caliphate is Hindu or Secular? Is Jihad Secular??

Am confused. (14/15)

Sources: Off: Saiyid Abul Qasim Namakin, Munshaat-wa Ruqaat-i Namakin, Aligarh University MSS No. 26, Farsiya 3 Nathr; Fathnama-i Chitor.

+ An annotated translation by Ishtiaq Ahmed Zilli & Ishtiaq Ahmad Zilli. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Vol. 33 (1971), pp. 350-361 (15/15)

-0-0-0-0-

Of course Akbar is the most tolerant of all the OTHER Moghuls, and this much we ought to accept. Thanks! When there have been no real standards of/for Moghuls to live up to, our genteel Aurangzeb could be hailed as an Angel, yeah?

Also, Moghul contributions, such as the above, to Bharat have really been great, tremendous, marvelous, excellent, incredible, unbelievable, humane, syncretic etc etc.

Akbar, is truly the Great. Amen.

END

Other pointers to (data/primary source based) information that praise Akbar.

 

 

 

micrometeorites!

10/05/2020

Sharing a sample of one of the many, many ‘lesson plans’ that I created, using bits and pieces from all over. So that the other teachers can also follow the script/steps & do it, may be spice it up, add some of their own kinkiness etc etc – that is, if they like these modes of madnesses, or madenesses, if you will.

Read the rest of this entry »

இளைஞர் ஆர்எஸ் ப்ரபு அவர்களைப் பலவிஷயங்களின் காரணமாக (=அவருடைய களஅனுபவங்கள், படிப்பு, தீர்க்கமான – தமிழகத்தின்மீது கரிசனம்கொண்ட கருத்துகள், வேளாண்மை குறித்த பார்வைகள், முனைப்பு, வேளாண்ஆராய்ச்சி குறித்த ஆதங்கங்கள்…++) மதிக்கிறேன். (ஒரிரு முறை இவர் குறித்து எழுதியிருக்கிறேன்கூட: …நம்மாழ்வாரியம், ‘ஆர்கனிக்’ பஜனை மடங்கள், அகடவிகடன் – ஆனால், அழகான ஆர்எஸ் பிரபு: சில குறிப்புகள் 09/07/2017)

Read the rest of this entry »

இஸ்லாமியக் கல்லெறிதல் கலாச்சாரப் புராணத்தின், நவாப்ராணியம்மாள் உபபுராணம் முந்தைய  (கல்லெறிதலே பண்பாடாக (அல்லது குரூர வன்முறையே வழிபாடாக) என்பது போல, சில ஒருமாதிரி குறிப்புகள் (1/4) 07/05/2020) பதிவிலிருந்து தொடர்கிறது… Read the rest of this entry »

இது உரக்கச் சொல்லப்படவேண்டும். ஏனெனில். Read the rest of this entry »

There are many myths & farces about our dear Mughals (actually, Mongols) – who are re-introduced to us constantly by erudite darbari historians as – ‘Civilized folks,’ who made significant contribution to arts, architecture etc etc – and that they actually administratively ‘unified India’ + brought about the fine facets of syncretism, sufidom, ‘ganga-jamuni tehzeeb,’ ‘muslim-hindu bhaibhai’ etc, etc.

Of course, nothing could be farther from truth, or the then reality. Read the rest of this entry »